Search for: "Boland v. Boland" Results 21 - 40 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2016, 11:33 am
  Meanwhile, Shareholders argued that the court should apply an exception to the rule developed by the Court of Appeals in Boland v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 6:25 pm by Ross Davies
The speech was followed by comments from a panel of experts (Robert Boland, Murray Chass, Charles Korr, Richard Moss, and Michael Weiner) moderated by Arthur R. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
Akhtar v Boland [2014] EWCA Civ 943 Just a quick note on this one, after a conversation with a colleague reminded me I hadn’t written it up. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:22 pm
Adkins Holding:  (1) The traditional business judgment rule applies to a disinterested and independent board of directors' refusal of a stockholder litigation demand, not the modified business judgment rule established in Boland v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 4:45 pm
And that, when Justice Boland found out, he corrected the error. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Mitra Sharafi
–Table of Contents after the jump.1 Keppell v Bailey (1834); Hill v Tupper (1863) The Numerus Clausus and the Common LawBen McFarlane2 Todrick v Western National Omnibus Co Ltd (1934) The Interpretation of EasementsPeter Butt3 Re Ellenborough Park (1955) A Mere Recreation and AmusementElizabeth Cooke4 Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co Ltd; Old & Campbell Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Friendly Society (1979)Stitching Together… [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 6:08 am
Contents include:KJ Keith, Kirby Lecture in International Law 2019: New Zealand, Australia and International Human Rights: 1919–2019 Tim McCormack, Siobhain Galea & Daniel Westbury, The Sir Elihu Lauterpacht International Law Lecture 2018: The Development of Humanity as a Constraint on the Conduct of War Christina Voigt, ANZSIL Conference Keynote 2019: Climate Change, the Critical Decade and the Rule of Law Suzanne Zhou & Jonathan Liberman, Public Health, Intellectual Property, and the… [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:46 pm by Stephen Page
Boland and O'Ryan JJ held:Subsequent to the conclusion of the hearing we referred the decision in Wenz vArcher to the parties and provided them with an opportunity to make furthersubmissions. [read post]