Search for: "Bolus v. United Penn Bank" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
United Penn Bank, 525 A.2d 1215, 1225 (Pa.Super. 1987).Where a plaintiff's experts conflict with one another, the plaintiff is likely to be faced with a defense motion in limine seeking to preclude each expert's opinion on the basis that allowing such evidence would only serve to confuse, and not educate, the jury.Notably, in the separate scenario where the defense produces conflicting expert reports in a civil litigation matter, the defense may still be… [read post]