Search for: "Bond v. Jay" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2018, 6:01 am
Grundy (University of Melbourne) and Patrick Verwijmeren (Erasmus School of Economics and University of Melbourne), on Monday, March 26, 2018 Tags: Arbitrage, Bonds, Capital formation, Convertible bonds, Hedge funds The Fragmented Regulatory Landscape for Digital Tokens Posted by Jai R. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed at the Washington Examiner, Jay Hobbs weighs in on National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 2:49 am by Walter Olson
Grassley amicus) that Dodd-Frank doesn’t cover “whistleblowers” who never told the SEC [Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Some 40 or so years later, Chairman Clayton’s regeneration of Judge Sporkin’s gatekeeper liability lays the regulatory foundation for a successful and vast SEC ICO assault, which will leave some ICO lawyers looking over their shoulders, and others perhaps dashing for cover. 1970s:  SEC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 1:43 pm by Mark Ashton
bonded” with Pittsburghers at dinners, attending university events and theater festivals. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 6:13 am
Wang (Harvard Business School), on Wednesday, December 13, 2017 Tags: Airgas v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” Speaking at a conference in Washington a few days later, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton reinforced the Cyber Unit’s ICO mission and jurisdiction, noting that: “ . . . [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
The district court set bond in this case at $5 million. 2 We entered a temporary stay of the preliminary injunction pending resolution of this appeal. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 6:27 am
Loseman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Saturday, July 30, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fraud-on-the-Market, Halliburton, Merger litigation,Omnicare v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
  Finally, I'll also explain why the article's new account of the original understanding of the Necessary and Proper Clause can serve as a useful framework for addressing some of the issues presented in Bond v. [read post]