Search for: "Bonds v. Super. Ct."
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2020, 2:44 pm
Seems like a good deal for the bond company; they'll get their $5,000 fee (ten percent) and the odds are super high that Al-Zetawi will show up for trial. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 4:19 pm
(This amount seems super high to me, but perhaps the officers who went and picked up the offender ate and drove/flew quite well.)But the Court of Appeal reverses. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:43 am
Super. __ (App. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:08 pm
Ct. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:44 am
Ct. 2333, 105 L. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 2:13 am
It is logically inconsistent to deny mental health diversion on the ground that Moine was likely to commit a super-strike offense, while simultaneously finding he was not likely to inflict great bodily injury on persons in the community. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 8:50 am
Super. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 3:50 pm
Super. __ (App. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
Ct. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:07 pm
Ct. 1408, 158 L. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm
Ct. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:05 am
Ct. 302, 148 L. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 9:28 am
Ct. 1408, 158 L. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:17 am
Super. 419, 424 (App. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:43 pm
Super. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:29 pm
Ct. 1938). [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
Ct. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 12:00 pm
Ct. 158, 172 L. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Ct. 2195, 2009.) 12 Duq. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
Super. 2010)Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PCIn recognition of their 2009 decision in Ranalli v. [read post]
