Search for: "Bonds v. Super. Ct." Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2021, 4:19 pm
  (This amount seems super high to me, but perhaps the officers who went and picked up the offender ate and drove/flew quite well.)But the Court of Appeal reverses. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 2:13 am
It is logically inconsistent to deny mental health diversion on the ground that Moine was likely to commit a super-strike offense, while simultaneously finding he was not likely to inflict great bodily injury on persons in the community. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 2:44 pm
  Seems like a good deal for the bond company; they'll get their $5,000 fee (ten percent) and the odds are super high that Al-Zetawi will show up for trial. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 1:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” In simpler terms, a key distinction between the two principal types of private funds is that hedge funds generally invest in liquid capital, such as stocks and bonds, and it is easier for investors to sell their interests in such funds. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The phrase involuntarily leapt to mind when I read the recent post-trial decision by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Emily Pines in Suffolk Anesthesiology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The phrase involuntarily leapt to mind when I read the recent post-trial decision by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Emily Pines in Suffolk Anesthesiology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
Super. 2010)Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PCIn recognition of their 2009 decision in Ranalli v. [read post]