Search for: "Booker v Sessions"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2007, 12:59 pm
Booker, was among the many up-and-coming scholars who participated in the poster session at last weekend's Second Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 6:40 pm
The most notable is in Gonzales v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
The United States Supreme Court begins its October 2007 session on Monday, October 1. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 12:16 pm
See Miller v. [read post]
1 Jun 2006, 10:22 am
The Afternoon Sessions of the National Seminar on the Fed Sentencing Guidelines has breakout sessions. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:03 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:30 am
Hector EscalanteSession 4E | Getting a CLEW: ombuds facilitating change and bridging gaps via new Chair Leadership Engagement Workgroup, Melanie Jagneaux & Alicia Booker Lunch Session Block 5 Session 5A | Talking Circles for Ombuds: Engaging in Dialogue and Building Community, Kristine Paranica & Tessa ByerSession 5B | Ripped From the Higher Ed Headlines: How Might the Ombuds Help? [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 5:43 am
During the morning session, the office of Booker released 2003 emails [text, PDF] in which Kavanaugh raised doubts over whether Roe v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
Baptiste, 16-978, Sessions v. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 4:48 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:04 am
Booker in 2005, Justice Ginsburg said in announcing the opinion of the Court. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 10:09 am
Stephanie Zable analyzed how the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sessions v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:25 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:55 am
Cory Booker and Rep. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 11:42 pm
Today's SCOTUS decision in Beckles v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 2:15 pm
Reproductive rights Barr did not distance himself from his past assertion that Roe v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 6:15 am
Here's a scary one:Lee v. [read post]
