Search for: "Booker v. Thomas"
Results 1 - 20
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2024, 8:42 am
Booker v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:55 am
Cory Booker and Rep. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm
Its 5-4 ruling in McCleskey v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 6:02 pm
Justice Thomas was the only noted dissenter. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 4:09 am
But in James v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
Davis, and NLRB v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 9:16 am
Second, in Pearson v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented in part, calling the decision “an unprecedented departure from our deferential review of discretionary agency decisions. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 12:58 pm
From Novak v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
In Booker v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 8:04 am
Upon discovering Kurtzrock’s violation of Brady v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:24 am
Second, the Court’s ruling treated Obergefell v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 9:24 am
Booker that made those Guidelines advisory, not binding. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
Aside from those justices, in such cases Kennedy was closer to Alito than he was to either Scalia or Thomas. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:26 am
Under United States v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, so the amicus to defend the judgment would ordinarily be appointed by (and typically be a former law clerk of) Circuit Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:41 am
Less than a month ago, in Koons v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, dissented from denial of certiorari in Garco, writing that it “would have been an ideal case to reconsider” Auer deference, which he said “frustrates the notice and predictability purposes of rulemaking, and promotes arbitrary government. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
Today’s second argument is in Ohio v. [read post]
