Search for: "Boring v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 1,902
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2012, 2:20 pm by Rick Hills
In an effort to corner the market on blogging about boring federalism cases, I thought that I should shout out a warning about Kurns v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 4:40 am
State, to fit within the category of an illegal sentence, the illegality must inhere in the sentence itself, i.e., there either has been no convinction warranting any sentence or the sentence is not a permitted one for the conviction upon which it was imposed and, for either reason, is intrinsically and substantially unlawful. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 5:12 am
Who says summer law classes are boring? [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 7:43 pm
Who says summer law classes are boring? [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 4:23 pm
Looking to get your first argument in the United States Supreme Court? [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by stu@crimapp.com
In Swarthourt v Cooke, Supreme Court No. 10-333, the Court granted certiorari on a rather boring question concerning habeas corpus law: “Whether a federal court may grant habeas corpus relief to a state prisoner based on its view that the state court erred in applying the state-law standard of evidentiary sufficiency governing state parole decisions. [read post]