Search for: "Boroughs v. Social Security Administration" Results 21 - 40 of 43
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2014, 1:23 pm by Giles Peaker
Jakimaviciute, R (On the Application Of) v Hammersmith And Fulham London Borough Council [2014] EWCA Civ 1438 Eligibility for allocation list, reasonable preference and homelessness. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm by NL
Ibrahim v London Borough of Wandsworth [2013] EWCA Civ 20The question for the Court of Appeal in this second appeal from a homeless appeal, was “How should the courts deal with a plainly deficient homelessness decision when the deficiency has had no adverse consequences for the applicant? [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm by NL
Ibrahim v London Borough of Wandsworth [2013] EWCA Civ 20The question for the Court of Appeal in this second appeal from a homeless appeal, was “How should the courts deal with a plainly deficient homelessness decision when the deficiency has had no adverse consequences for the applicant? [read post]
Are nursing sled dog puppies sufficiently controlled if left at their mother's teat and the mother herself is securely tethered? [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 10:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Denry Okpor v London Borough of Lewisham, Bromley County Court 25 October 2011 [Transcript not publicly available] Adam Wagner represented Mr Okpor in this case. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative LawSource: Justia November 11, 2011 Farris v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:24 am by David Smith
Rochdale Borough Council v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173Apologies for the late delivery of this case note which has been held up by a blizzard (of work rather than the kind afflicting the Eastern USA).This case is somewhat complicated and involved so you will have to bear with me. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:24 am by David Smith
Rochdale Borough Council v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173Apologies for the late delivery of this case note which has been held up by a blizzard (of work rather than the kind afflicting the Eastern USA).This case is somewhat complicated and involved so you will have to bear with me. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
This case laid out a set of principles which effectively render unlawful any decision based on a discrete element of the Immigration Rules which is placed beyond Parliament’s scrutiny and left to the “unfettered judgment of the rule-maker…criteria affecting individuals’ status and entitlements which…have not themselves been tendered for parliamentary scrutiny ( see Sedley LJ at para 33 of  R v Secretary of State for Social Services ex p… [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 9:39 am by Green and Associates
Prosecutors said she acquired nursing licenses in the state using the names, Social Security numbers, birth dates and credentials of two nurses who lived in New York and Canada.Ms. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm by NL
There was also a judgmental decision as to how any such right was to be delivered, as the duty under section 193 was merely to secure that accommodation was available. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm by NL
There was also a judgmental decision as to how any such right was to be delivered, as the duty under section 193 was merely to secure that accommodation was available. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 5:05 am by David Smith
LB Croydon v Shanahan [2010] EWCA Crim 98 Ms Shanahan was tried on three offences under section 111A(1A) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 5:05 am by David Smith
LB Croydon v Shanahan [2010] EWCA Crim 98 Ms Shanahan was tried on three offences under section 111A(1A) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:36 am by Dave
Two HB decisions from the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeals Chamber have appeared, which are interesting because they demonstrate the approach of the Tribunal to the construction of the HB Regs (Torbay Borough Council v RF [2010] UKUT 7 (AAC) (14 January 2010)) and the Tribunal's approach to appeal grounds (HN v London Borough of Brent [2009] UKUT 289 (AAC) (11 December 2009)). [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:36 am by Dave
Two HB decisions from the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeals Chamber have appeared, which are interesting because they demonstrate the approach of the Tribunal to the construction of the HB Regs (Torbay Borough Council v RF [2010] UKUT 7 (AAC) (14 January 2010)) and the Tribunal's approach to appeal grounds (HN v London Borough of Brent [2009] UKUT 289 (AAC) (11 December 2009)). [read post]