Search for: "Bose Corporation"
Results 21 - 40
of 113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2009, 11:00 am
Hexawave, Inc., the Bose Corporation was no longer manufacturing and selling audio tape recorders and players when it renewed its WAVE trademark for use with several goods, including the tape recorders and players. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:38 pm
The TTAB has not sustained a single fraud claim in the two years since the CAFC issued its decision in In re Bose Corporation. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 11:28 am
In re Bose Corporation, 2008-1448 at 6. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
” See In re Bose Corporation, Appeal No. 2008-1448, slip op. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:37 am
Bose Corporation v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:01 am
We all know that the CAFC in In re Bose Corporation jettisoned the TTAB's "knew or should have known" standard for fraud set out in Medinol v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:27 pm
The Board applied the CAFC's fraud standard set out in In re Bose Corporation, 91 USPQ2d 1938 (Fed. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:36 pm
Of course, the catalyst for the webinar is the CAFC's recent decision in In re Bose Corporation, Appeal No. 2008-1448 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:01 am
Countless articles, seminars, webinars, and postings have informed us that in In re Bose Corporation, 91 USPQ2d 1938 (Fed. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:41 am
Further, all divisions of Bose, including the assumed infringers and interveners Bose GmbH and Bose Limited, were legally inextricably linked to the Bose Corporation. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:14 am
Further, all divisions of Bose, including the assumed infringers and interveners Bose GmbH and Bose Limited, were legally inextricably linked to the Bose Corporation. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 1:31 pm
We all know that the CAFC in In re Bose Corporation jettisoned the TTAB’s “knew or should have known” standard for fraud set out in Medinol v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:05 am
In its fraud analysis in In re Bose Corporation, 91 USPQ2d 1938 (Fed. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
Did they miss your submission, or was it not relevant? [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:36 am
In re Nittany Corporation, Serial No. 88439889 (March 17, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Elizabeth A. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:54 pm
The MMC’s conclusion that the mere existence of certain non-voting rights of an investor can give rise to the ability to influence corporate policy and decisions resonates with the conclusion of the CCI in the order referred above. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:09 pm
OVERTURNED BY: In Re Bose Corp., Opp. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:23 am
Federal Corporation, Opposition No. 91168556 (February 24, 2010) [not precedential]. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:12 am
Not a single fraud claim has been upheld by the Board since the CAFC's Bose decision.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 2:44 pm
See In re Bose Corporation, 476 F.3d 1331, 91 USPQ2d 1938, 1941 (Fed. [read post]
