Search for: "Boston Gas Co. v. Department of Public Utilities"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
The majority further wrote: "The Board did not specifically find the natural gas pipelines to be public utilities per se, but nonetheless found that the public utility systemwide presumption should apply because the pipelines are relied on as the source of supply for public utilities. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 12:09 pm
Cox Enterprises, Inc., 715 S.E.2d 458 (Ga. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
Click Here Pacific Pipelines to pay penalty for oil spill. - Eric Watkins, Oil & Gas Journal, January 25, 2010 The US Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency said Pacific Pipeline Systems LLP, a Long Beach, Calif. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
Gay, Lesbian & Bisexual Grp. of Boston, 515 U.S. 557, 578 (1995). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
The utility will also pay up to $100,000 for consultants – picked jointly by the utility and the activists — to critique the plan and advise the activists about any new problems. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 4:38 am
Francis Xavier v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Now that the elder law bar has seen several copies of the MassHealth Essay, it is clear why the Office of Medicaid has shielded the MassHealth Essay from public release. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Now that the elder law bar has seen several copies of the MassHealth Essay, it is clear why the Office of Medicaid has shielded the MassHealth Essay from public release. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm
City of Boston, No. 97-1912, 2001 L 69488, at *7 (Mass. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Less publicized are the compelling reasons to believe the surtax may generate negative economic consequences that outweigh any social benefit from additional tax revenue. [read post]
