Search for: "Bounds v. Asset Acceptance, LLC."
Results 41 - 59
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
KALTENBACHER, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:41 pm
See Mock v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
… 18 Long v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
The class’s impact extended beyond the geographic bounds of the properties in the class. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
WesternGeco LLC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
This essay explores the possible dual readings of AT&T v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:57 pm
Supreme Court in the 2010 case of Morrison v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:32 am
Oculus VR, LLC, No. 3:14-CV-1849 (N.D. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
(D.I. 61 at TA155) When the Notes were issued, the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency ("PHEAA") was each Trust's sole or primary servicer, bound by the PHEAA Servicing Agreement. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm
She argues that they "fraudulently informed [her] that the [d]ebts were not discharged and demanded . . . and accepted payment. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 6:40 am
Agriculture and Nutrition, LLC Industries $901 million United States Gypsum $3.9 billion Leslie Controls n.a. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 4:02 am
The discussion highlights a New York case I wrote about on this blog, called Reichman v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:18 pm
See Chadwick v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself: see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9] A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
The Second District Court of Appeals in Los Angeles has ruled that banks are “legally bound by their loan modification promises,” and can be sued for fraud when homeowners rely on such promises and are damaged as a result. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
It would also seem prudent (though hopefully redundant) for the advance notice bylaw to require that any material information disclosed to the corporation pursuant to the bylaw or director questionnaires also be disclosed to stockholders promptly as part of the proxy statement or pursuant to Rule 14a-12 as a pre-filing solicitation.[8] It appears that nominating stockholders sometimes do not consider themselves bound by Rule 14a-12 until well after the date when notice of a nomination is… [read post]
