Search for: "Bounds v. Barnett"
Results 1 - 20
of 107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2012, 5:34 am
The summary judgment decision issued on October 31st by Ohio federal district court judge David Dowd in Barnett v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:25 am
My point was to show how the reasoning of Justice Scalia’s concurring opinion in Raich in no way bound him to uphold the mandate. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, my colleague Randy Barnett, who's representing the private plaintiffs in the ACA case, has written a post focusing upon Justice Kennedy's expressed concern that in order for the Court to uphold section 5000A of the ACA, it might have to issue what Randy calls an "unbounded" opinion, one that would permit Congress to require the purchase of virtually any product--an outcome that Justice Kennedy fears would “change the relationship of… [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:02 am
“The convention is bound by the nature of the call,” Natelson said. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:06 am
United States and Printz v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:56 pm
I am getting ready to teach MGM v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 1:13 pm
Randy’s argument is more or less the one Justice Scalia makes in his concurring opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
But given that Gonzales v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 10:51 am
Nisus Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
Or, in the words of John Marshall (with whom I sometimes do agree) in McCulloch v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:16 pm
So said a Texas court in 2001 Trinity Fund, L.L.C. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 9:31 am
Many commentators, including my good friends Randy Barnett and Larry Solum, have praised Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:21 am
We see that same orientation in Barnett’s theory, with its rejection of the authority of the dead and its embrace of the sovereignty of each living individual. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:42 pm
Madison, McCulloch v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 9:04 am
Barry Barnett Our free feed can leap tall buildings in a single bound. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:35 am
” It is my sense that NFIB v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 11:07 am
(Randy Barnett) A few weeks ago, I blogged about oral argument in the DC Circuit Court of Appeals in the Seven-Sky v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:44 pm
By the following year, a district court judge had cited Barnett in his opinion striking down health care reform, and Barnett himself had left behind his March 2010 conclusion that the Supreme Court would need to risk its credibility in a politically charged case, Bush v. [read post]
12 May 2007, 5:07 pm
School Dist. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:55 am
The panel originally ruled in favor of United because it felt bound by a Seventh Circuit ruling in a similar case decided in 2000, EEOC v. [read post]
