Search for: "Bowen v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Jan. 19-23, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm
Welles-Bowen Realty Northern District of Ohio at Toledo 09a0025p.06 Barr v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
Bowen v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:38 am
Bowen v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 4:04 am
In Week One, we focused on the only contested County Court race of Lindsay v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
24 May 2008, 10:32 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, April 03, 2008 Bowen v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Therefore, in interpreting and applying this Code section, the courts of this state may draw from the opinions ofthe United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 12:00 pm
§ 2(b)(2); Bowen v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 9:55 am
Barbara Bowen. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
State, 701 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1997) and Buenoano v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 1:11 am
The justices have already agreed to hear a similar case, Riegel v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
It is Mr. 2 001.240 State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 3:26 am
Such action shall be brought in the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the plaintiff resides, or has his principal place of business, or, if he does not reside or have his principal place of business within any such judicial district, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.42 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 4:34 am
Plaintiff sued the Government in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:20 pm
§ 2554, that requires the United States military to assist the Boy Scouts organization with its Jamboree, a big to-do held every four years. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 8:10 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 10:31 am
Although HDC argued that both United States v. [read post]
