Search for: "Bowers v. Sells"
Results 21 - 40
of 48
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am
Bower v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
” At the time, none of the compounds McFadden was selling was listed as a federally prohibited “controlled substance. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:50 pm
Jonathan Markell and U.S. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 5:22 am
Newell v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
--Marvin v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 2:17 pm
Bowers cites to the case of Ellerbe v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Those exceptions are (1) selling the drug after the FDA withdraws it from the market; (2) bribing an FDA official; and (3) committing fraud on the FDA. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am
Sell. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
Richards, evaluates two Supreme Court cases: Bowers v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 10:49 am
Gingrich Sell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:05 pm
If you use iOS 4.0 on an iPhone 3G, you know that it is V-E-R-Y S-L-O-W. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:07 pm
” When the Court finally overruled Bowers in Lawrence v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:00 am
Howell v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Remember, this is pediatric surgery, and very few companies sell either drugs or devices specifically intended and approved for use in children. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:44 pm
See Bowers v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:11 pm
" Instead, looking by analogy to a 2003 Supreme Court decision involving forcible medication of a mentally-ill criminal defendant, Sell v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 12:22 pm
(At one point prior to the bench trial in Bowers v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:15 pm
" After reviewing the Lawrence court's quotation from and reliance upon Justice Stevens' dissent in Bowers v. [read post]