Search for: "Bowles v. Jackson"
Results 1 - 20
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2011, 6:27 pm
CBS Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 4:16 am
The legal fallout from Janet Jackson's Super Bowl stunt continues:As often happens in indecency cases, the legal issues in CBS Corp. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 3:24 pm
CBS (08-653) — the case concerning the Super Bowl halftime incident in 2004 involving singers Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 10:38 am
First a trip down memory lane: It’s been 8 years since Janet Jackson’s Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime “wardrobe malfunction,” that lead to an FCC revamp of fines and regulations. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:51 am
For more information, the lawsuit is Jackson Hewitt Inc v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 3:36 pm
This just in, from the AP: A federal appeals court on Monday threw out a $550,000 indecency fine against CBS Corp. for the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show that ended with Janet Jackson's breast-baring "wardrobe malfunction. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:51 am
Gone with a Federal Communications Commission plea, which the Court denied, was a $550,000 fine on the network for the fleeting exposure of one of performer Janet Jackson’s breasts during the half-time show at the Super Bowl (a pro football game) in early February 2004. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 4:00 am
CBS v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 4:00 am
CBS v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 1:21 pm
Today was the 2023 Super Bowl of Internet Law at the U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:00 am
The cases are Jackson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
See Bowles v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:14 am
Jackson);Said that a plaintiff alleging sexual harassment claims under the Minnesota Human Rights Act based on sexual harassment by a supervisor is not required to prove that the employer knew or should have known about the harassment and failed to take timely and appropriate action (Freiler v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:02 am
. $550,000 for airing the 2004 Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime wardrobe malfunction that caused Justin Timberlake to bare Janet Jackson's breast for an entire nine-sixteenths of a second (see "TUOL" post 9/17/09).As reported by the Associated Press, the same 3rd Circuit panel that backed CBS in 2008 again found the FCC improperly penalized CBS in CBS Corp. et al v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 7:23 am
Robbins and Bowles v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 11:42 am
Mele v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 2:14 pm
The case is Muhammad Ali Enterprises LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
See Bowles v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 3:43 am
Yes, that was the date of the infamous Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show, featuring Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake, the horrible denouement of which is recounted in vivid detail in the 3rd Circuit’s opinion the other day in CBS Corp. v. [read post]
