Search for: "Bowles v. State of Kansas"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2021, 7:59 am
The growth is a result of more states legalizing sports betting since the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
23 Dec 2006, 10:50 am
ESTAuburn Tigers (10) v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 8:34 pm
In the 1963 case of AFL v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:07 am
See also Bowling v. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
ESTTo be televised by ESPNGrand Valley State Lakers v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 5:25 pm
On October 14, the Court will hear an original jurisdiction dispute between three states that share interests in the flows of the Republican River: Kansas, Colorado and Nebraska. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 4:43 pm
ETOregon State (24) v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
He argued that Nebraska could not have foreseen dust-bowl-like conditions. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 10:47 pm
" Sure, LSU v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:20 am
Kansas State, which upset Texas 41-21 last week, is favored by 3 over undefeated Kansas. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:32 pm
The transcript of oral argument in Bond v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
The third case, United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:26 pm
Kansas State: Wildcats favored by 7 Our call: Kansas State 33-30 Result: - Penn State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:16 am
Kansas State Wildcats by 35 Kansas State 41-10 Kansas State 42-10 Northwestern St. v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 11:29 am
His simple dissent two years ago in Bowles v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
Harbison v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
Heading out West, we come to Kansas v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:10 am
Auburn was lucky to win its opener against Kansas State, 23-13. [read post]
