Search for: "Bowman v. South Carolina" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
John Nichols wrote a great article for The South Carolina Lawyer Bulletin for Spring 2008 discussing the admissibility of expert's opinions pursuant to Rule 702, and the lack of necessity for South Carolina to adopt the federal standard described as Daubert for the infamous 1993 decision Daubert v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  A South Carolina lawyer will ask the Supreme Court to rename Brown v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 7:56 am by Phil Dixon
Post-conviction non-profit lacked standing to assert First Amendment challenge to South Carolina’s law surrounding disclosure of execution protocols Justice 360 v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  For that reason, the Third Restatement and an increasing majority of states (Wisconsin and South Carolina, at least, have changed during the lifespan of this blog) require proof of an alternative design as an essential element of all design-based claims.New Hampshire, however, isn’t one of those states. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
Box 1437/Slot 1412 Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: (501) 682-2441; (800) 852-5494 (Toll Free) Fax: (501) 371-2785 Web: http://www.state.ar.us/dhs/aging/index.html ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Disability Law Resource Project 2323 South Shepard Boulevard, Suite 1000 Houston, TX 77019 Phone: (713) 520-0232 (V/TTY); (800) 949-4232 (V/TTY/Toll Free) E-mail: dlrp@ilru.org Web: http://www.dlrp.org State Affiliate: Arkansas ADA Roundtable c/o… [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
" For example, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, North Carolina, and South Carolina all provide natural experiments in the effects of changes in carry licensing laws. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
: The Case for Critical Histories as Method in Decolonizing South African Legal EducationLunch 12:30-2:00 (St. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]