Search for: "Boyes v. Boyes"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2012, 1:08 pm
Boye filed suit against Daiquiris for damages – Boye v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 9:02 am
The abstract provides: This paper comments on Professor Cristina Tilley's rewritten feminist opinion in Boyes v Kerr (Texas 1993). [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 8:27 am
Boyes 2013 BCPC 204[1] Mr. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:27 am
"] From Boye v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:35 pm
Justice Curtis in Boyes v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 3:58 am
I just finished reading and heartily enjoying the book, Etiquette Guide to China: Know the rules that make th difference, by Boye Lafayette De Mente and Patrick Wallace. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 10:59 am
The breach of fiduciary duty claim was correctly dismissed as redundant of the legal malpractice claim (see Boye v Rubin & Bailin, LLP, 152 AD3d 1, 10 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 11:27 pm
Thus, separate counsel was an intervening and superseding cause of any damages (see Boye v Rubin & Bailin, LLP, 152 AD3d 1, 10 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 7:37 am
"Clap" meaning gonorrhea does go back as far as 1587, which is older than the reference to the noise of hands slapping together, which is traced only to a1616 (to Shakespeare's "Henry V": "Men, Wiues, and Boyes, Whose shouts & claps out-voyce the deep-mouth'd Sea."), but not as old as the general loud noise meaning which goes back to 1440." [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:42 am
Thus, separate counsel was an intervening and superseding cause of any damages (see Boye v Rubin & Bailin, LLP, 152 AD3d 1, 10 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:59 am
” “Even were it not untimely, the malpractice claim should also be dismissed because “the proximate cause of any damages sustained by plaintiff was not the alleged malpractice of defendant[], but rather the intervening and superseding failure of plaintiff’s successor attorney” (Boye v Rubin & Bailin, LLP, 152 AD3d 1, 10 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:39 am
This is not an issue involving subject matter within the ken of an ordinary person and cannot be adequately judged based on the ordinary experience of the fact finder without expert testimony (cf Boye v Rubin & Bailin, LLP, 152 AD3d 1, 9 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:01 pm
As the U.S. game opened, the German dominance evoked memories of the pithy law-school brief for the contracts chestnut Hadley v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Capobianco v Ambach, 112 AD2d 640 [3d Dept 1985]). [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Capobianco v Ambach, 112 AD2d 640 [3d Dept 1985]). [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:39 am
Woe to the blogger who gets the parties the wrong way round, as was the danger in United Airlines Inc v United Airways Limited, not yet on BAILII, a decision from last Friday in the High Court (Chancery Division), England and Wales. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
The Kat thanks his friend Isabel Davies (Boyes Turner) for this snippet of news. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 10:24 pm
"[V]ery bad…for the law firms that pay them, for the associates who receive them, for the clients who foot the bill for them, and for the society we serve. . . the higher salaries are wasted dollars. [read post]
