Search for: "Boykin v. Boykin"
Results 21 - 40
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2012, 4:43 am
Mitchell, 565 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 2009)] is distinguishable from the instant case and does not provide a basis for the suppression of Boykins's cell phones.4 See United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 9:28 pm
In Jamison v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 3:44 am
Boykins later identified the man as Bell. [read post]
Second Circuit States that Pleading Allegations on "Information and Belief" Acceptable under Twombly
12 May 2010, 7:09 am
Per Arista Records, LLC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 10:13 am
Digital Ally, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:25 am
Boykin. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 6:30 am
He attempted to add the Catholic designation in order to be allowed to recover his gold cross.In Boykins v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
Read the blog’s analysis of Boykin here. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 11:18 am
Boykin. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
” Boykin, 445 So. 2d at 538-39; see also Hankins v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
” Boykin, 445 So. 2d at 538-39; see also Hankins v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
” Boykin, 445 So. 2d at 538-39; see also Hankins v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 8:23 am
" Boykin v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:38 am
We see the story in Boykin v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:01 am
In the guided exploration, to illustrate the process of excavating and re-shaping persuasive arguments, the article explores the storytelling and framing of the briefs (including the brief of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund) and the majority (Justice Douglas') and dissenting (Justice Harlan's) opinions in Boykin v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 3:32 pm
The First explains that it thinks that "Even if Boykin [v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:38 pm
Once again an appellate court has reversed a conviction pursuant to People v McNab (167 AD2d 858 [4th Dept 1990]) where there were more offenses proved than charged.In People v Boykins (2011 NY Slip Op 04838 [6/10/11) the Appellate Division, Fourth Department reversed a conviction for attempted murder in the second degree and dismissed the count in the indictment charging defendant with that crime, where that count referred to a single attempt to cause the death of the… [read post]
