Search for: "Boys v. Marks"
Results 81 - 100
of 733
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2016, 4:44 am
| The U.S. presidential election of 1876: votes, cannabis and intellectual property| CJEU upholds duty to reverse-engineer trade marks in Rubik's cube decision, but what about the actual v abstract test? [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:51 am
’ D.H. asked `what games,’ and defendant responded `[b]ig boy games lol. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:40 pm
Related posts:Boies Beats Wells Boies v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 6:31 am
Ash v. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 12:36 pm
(In his shop, Fat Enzo’s, murals of Mark Twain and Hunter S. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:51 am
Wonderbread 5 v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:26 am
A police officer who tased a deaf 12-year-old boy twice has been granted qualified immunity by the Second Circuit, which dismissed the civil rights case on the basis that a reasonable police officer would have believed the tasing was necessary to prevent the boy from acting out any further and hurting someone.The case is Muchette v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Gabriel Goncalves, a 12-year-old boy who was on the autism spectrum, was riding a school bus driven by Mark Hudovenko. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:58 am
“For two marks, spell and define ‘pre-eclampsia,’ and a bonus point for anyone who can explain the difference between a breech and normal delivery,” instructs a midwife from a blackboard to a small class of two pregnant girls and a young boy who would otherwise be sat outside the headteacher’s office (the absentees were either suffering from morning sickness or male and in a maths lesson). [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 3:06 am
In re Fat Boys Water Sports LLC, 118 USPQ2d 1511, 1512 (TTAB 2016).Applicant's own usage of the proposed mark is evidence of its descriptiveness. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
When it comes to cars,boys will be boys ...It's summertime, and the courts are taking a break, but there are still some cases waiting to be pulled out of the kat-sack and given a bit of attention: here's one of them. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:45 am
” Briefly: At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen reports on the latest developments in Shapiro v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 4:45 am
The First Department applied the doctrine of primary assumption of risk and dismissed the complaint, in Roberts v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 6:07 am
On January 8th the First Department decided a case which parents may want to take note of - Roberts v Boys & Girls Republic, Inc., 2008 NY Slip Op 00073. [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:24 pm
Cross-posted to Library Boy. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:23 am
SOFA Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 2:17 am
Goya Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 4:20 pm
That, boys and girls, is a very big deal. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:23 am
Haaland v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:28 am
Possibly – just possibly – a certain number of boys want to grow up playing football like Garry Flitcroft. [read post]
