Search for: "Bradford v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 441
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2008, 5:22 am
The Scheduled Panel Members are: Chief Judge Baker, Judges Darden and Bradford. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 11:19 am
The Scheduled Panel Members are: Judges Riley, Bailey and Bradford. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 3:42 am
The Scheduled Panel Members are: Chief Judge Baker, Judges Najam and Bradford. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:14 am
R.C., a 16-page opinion, Judge Bradford writes:Appellant-Respondent H.R. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
See also Georgia State Bar Rules, DR 7-102(A)(3), (4) and (5); DR 7-106(C) (1); Rule 4-102(d) Standard 45 and O.C.G.A. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 11:20 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Kelli Plump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
” Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 12:42 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
” In United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
W.C.A.B. (2nd—B331989) Petitions for Writ of Review—Untimely Petitions—Court of Appeal dismissed applicant’s Petition for Writ of Review as untimely, when applicant failed… Appeals Board Panel Decisions Bradford (Eiren) v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:52 am
It granted stays, for example, in a pair of death-row cases raising that issue, and then simply denied review of the cases when they came up for further consideration (Bradford v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 10:42 am
" State of Indiana v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 4:33 pm
Calvin Bradford. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 9:34 am
US v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) In re E.T. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 10:23 am
” In a July 25, 2018 decision, United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 7:08 am
The Scheduled Panel Members are: Judges May, Barnes and Bradford. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 3:15 pm
Thus the 2001 possession Order was no longer enforceable and, via Marshall v Bradford MC, the Court had no powers under s.85 to enforce or vary the order. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 5:00 pm
Coleman v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:26 pm
On Tuesday, the Court ordered oral argument “in due course” — likely during the current Term — on a key aspect of the nearly four-year-old case of Montana v. [read post]
