Search for: "Brady v. Department of Personnel" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
§ 2000e-16(a) that “all personnel actions effecting employees or applicants for employment … in executive agencies as defined in Title 5 … shall be made free from any discrimination” permits federal-sector personnel actions that are not made free from any discrimination or retaliation, as long as discrimination or retaliation is not the but-for cause of the personnel action, or rather prohibits personnel actions where discrimination… [read post]
4 May 2007, 10:42 pm
Because it failed to do so, Matthews argues that the prosecution violated his right to due process under Brady v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 12:47 pm by Amy Howe
The prosecutors’ omissions, Chinn contended, violated his rights under the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Brady v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit concluded that the Civil Service Reform Act barred such a suit brought by Jason Payne, a civilian employee of the Department of the Navy. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:55 am by Gritsforbreakfast
  And I guess a more articulate way of thinking about it is that Brady v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
A court that imposes a term of imprisonment for a first or second offense under this section may sentence the person so convicted to the county jail, to the workhouse of the county wherein the offense was committed, to an inpatient rehabilitation program or to an Intoxicated Driver Resource Center or other facility approved by the chief of the Intoxicated Driving Program Unit in the Department of Health and Senior Services. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously evaluated a Brady… [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United States (1997), in which the Supreme Court held that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am by David Aaron
The query provision also requires that any FBI personnel who conduct queries must receive annual training on applicable procedures. [read post]