Search for: "Brake v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
Hunter v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:15 am
On December 15, the United States Supreme Court released its opinion in Heien v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 6:06 pm
Simply stated, a reasonable person would be immediately aware of the obvious risks of this conduct. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 12:02 pm
Corp., et al. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:13 am
Heien v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:59 am
BancFirst v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:45 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
United States, and Davis v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:51 am
Thanks to the IPKat for pointing out Knorr-Bremse Systems for Commercial Vehicles Ltd v Haldex Brake Products GmbH [2008] EWHC 156 (Pat), a ruling of England and Wales Patents Court where judge Mr Justice Lewison stated that "There is at the least a good arguable case that, even if KBS UK are bound by the non-challenge [to patent validity] clause (which in my judgment they are not) that clause is void because it contravenes article 81 EC:". . . 48. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 11:32 pm
In TransAm Trucking, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 7:19 pm
" Yesterday's FinCri Advisor featured a jeremiad in which some experts warned that the Cuomo v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:01 am
He is most recently the author of "Donald Trump v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Update 10/12/18: A Massachusetts state court jury Friday afternoon awarded the family of a former brake worker $43.1 million after finding R.J. [read post]
12 May 2010, 5:30 am
Donaldson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Keefer v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Splitting the Baby: The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Young v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 9:50 pm
In Sorel v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:51 pm
In affirming the trial court’s decision, the state supreme court receded from the 1984 precedent set in the case of Florida Physician’s Insurance Reciprocal v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:49 am
North Carolina, the burned-out brake light case in which the state supreme court ruled that an investigative stop may be based on an officer’s mistake of law, so long as the mistake is reasonable. [read post]
