Search for: "Branch v. Carter"
Results 1 - 20
of 196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Claeyssen of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, District of Columbia (Carter G. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Claeyssen of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, District of Columbia (Carter G. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Aug. 13, 2021) (sexual assault); Carter v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
M'Clung v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Carter Snead As Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners, Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 3:21 pm
In Counterman v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
Carter: Foreign Policy, China, and the Resurgence of Executive Branch Primacy (2023). [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:29 am
" This is where Carter Coal naturally fits. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
And Gundy v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:56 am
(For example, the Carter Center report noted the Nigeria elections were marred by irregularities and sometimes by outright fraud, while the EU report noted the Zimbabwe elections were not held on a level playing field.). [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
To follow this thread, consider two of the “remedial devices” mentioned above: remands to the political branches, and tolerance for interpretive disagreement. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:16 pm
The executive branch has no authority to invent new crimes. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm
In a civil suit, Judge David Carter called the 2020 election interference scheme “a coup in search of a legal theory. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Aug. 13, 2021) (sexual assault); Carter v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 6:43 am
Bas v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[8] In Federalist 71, Alexander Hamilton argued that a key role of the Executive Branch is to make decisions carefully under pressure: to undertake “cool and sedate reflection. [read post]
8 May 2023, 3:50 am
Further, except where there is deceit directed against a court, Judiciary Law § 487 “applies only to wrongful conduct by an attorney in an action that is actually pending” (Mahler v Campagna, 60 AD3d 1009, 1012-1013; see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178; Meimeteas v Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, 105 AD3d 643, 643). [read post]