Search for: "Brand v. Ford Motor Company"
Results 21 - 40
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2011, 12:40 pm
Crossroads Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 7:00 am
In that case, the Dodge brothers, founders of Dodge Motors, and stockholders of Ford Motor Co., sued Ford Motor Co. alleging that Henry Ford’s decision to reinvest the company’s profits to cut the price of the Model T Ford and raise the wages of his workers was an incorrect decision. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 7:00 am
In that case, the Dodge brothers, founders of Dodge Motors, and stockholders of Ford Motor Co., sued Ford Motor Co. alleging that Henry Ford’s decision to reinvest the company’s profits to cut the price of the Model T Ford and raise the wages of his workers was an incorrect decision. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm
First approach: MODEL E is an obvious member, or future member, of the Ford Motor Company “MODEL X” “family of marks. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:39 am
Ford wheel of fortune spins as CJEU faces spare part questions Case C-500/14 Ford Motor Company is a new reference for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union made by the District Court of Turin. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 8:02 am
Ford, when the Dodge brothers, investors in Ford Motor Company at the time, sued Henry Ford and won because the Dodge brothers were stockholders and Henry Ford decided to reinvest profits and retain cash instead of giving dividends to the investors. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:04 am
Have you or a loved one been injured in a motor vehicle accident? [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 1:29 pm
Ford, when the Dodge brothers, investors in Ford Motor Company at the time, sued Henry Ford and won because the Dodge brothers were stockholders and Henry Ford decided to reinvest profits and retain cash instead of giving dividends to the investors. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Supp. 2d 284, 289 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (“In fact the counterclaims, alleging unfair competition and interference with competitive advantage, were used to argue (albeit unsuccessfully) that the injunction application was barred by the doctrine of unclean hands, see Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
Supp. 2d 284, 289 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (“In fact the counterclaims, alleging unfair competition and interference with competitive advantage, were used to argue (albeit unsuccessfully) that the injunction application was barred by the doctrine of unclean hands, see Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:54 am
Back on topic: I was tickled to death to see that Ford Motor Company was vindicated last Friday in the telecommuting/accommodation lawsuit brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:37 am
Thus, just as the local Ford dealer could buy a huge billboard next to the Chevy dealership saying "Don't buy a Chevy until you have looked at our cars - they're better," or just as General Motors could buy a comparative newspaper ad on the automobiles page on just the day when Warren Brown is reviewing that snazzy new Ford model, and just as a drug store can strategically locate its generic products right next to the brand name… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:11 am
Today is one of its most interesting ones; it covers, apart from Harry Potter, a discussion of what is almost the opposite of product placement -- giant motor company Ford has been hit for a second time by a major movie which sheds poor light on the brand. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:07 am
"
'Unprecedented' $15M Jury Award Thrown Out; New Trial Ordered for Ford
The Associated Press
A U.S. federal judge threw out a $15 million jury verdict and ordered a new trial in a lawsuit against Ford Motor Co. by a Tulsa, Okla., couple whose son died in a rollover crash in 2003. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm
(Citing Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Ford Motor Co., 922 S.W.2d 572 (Tex. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:28 pm
Ford Motor Co. (588 F.Supp. 3d 929, W.D. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 10:20 am
In Roverano v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) China’s biggest ever patent dispute comes to a multi-million dollar end:… [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
KG v President of Gernamn Patent- und Markenamt (IPKat) Geobra Brandstätter assert copyright against vicar Pfarrer Markus Bomhard for using ‘deformed’ Playmobil figurines to depict biblical scenes (IPKat) (The IP Factor) Bundesgerichtshof on when a trade mark is distinctive enough to qualify for registration: STREETBALL case (Class 46) Still no infringement of Tuc cracker shape, says German appellate court (Class 46) Greece Well-known MOUYER trade… [read post]
