Search for: "Brand v. Brand" Results 61 - 80 of 10,601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2010, 9:23 pm by Simon Gibbs
  As before, the t-shirts have our brand new Legal Costs Blog logo on the rear and one of the following slogans on the front: "Actually, I think you'll find it was Lord Scott who gave the dissenting judgment in Callery v Gray" "The Legal Costs Blog is very educational. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 11:34 am
In Michael Toth v Emirates [2011] EWPCC 18, 13 June 2011.) [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:12 am
 Consumer brands such as Nike and Coca-Cola have more to gain from association with wholesome causes -- and more to lose from unwholesome ones -- than enterprises such as Gazprom whose clientele is unlikely to switch to another brand of fuel supplier on a whim or a matter of moral scruples. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:08 am by tortsprof
Under this theory, a plaintiff sues a brand-name manufacturer of a drug for injuries allegedly caused... [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 3:42 pm by Jeff Klein
We have discussed in previous posts the Supreme Court’s decision in Pliva v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 4:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
via Zachary Schrag: NEH Rules for Use of NEH Logo: “The logo consists of the full name, National Endowment for the Humanities, as well as the symbol. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 8:34 pm by Patent Docs
Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC case from 4:15 to 5:45 pm (Eastern) on March 27, 2017 at the American University Washington College of Law in Washington, DC. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 3:39 am by Susan Perera
Which brands come to mind when you think of Sears? [read post]