Search for: "Brandes v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2009, 2:35 pm
Brand (University of Pittsburgh - School of Law) has posted Treaties and the Separation of Powers in the United States: A Reassessment after Medellin v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
The post Supreme Court Considers the Reach of the Lanham Act Outside of United States appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
The post Supreme Court Considers the Reach of the Lanham Act Outside of United States appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 5:22 pm
So last Wednesday (March 22, 2017, if you’re joining us late) the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 3:11 pm
This entry is a follow up to a previous blog article[1] regarding the case of Varsity Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
Mega Brands claims that the trademark registration should be invalidated, which would allow Mega Brands to freely export its products to the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 8:21 am
Brand Techs (a fairly recent application of the test). [read post]
6 May 2013, 1:05 am
United States, the Court held... [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Since about 2007, it has also continuously sold wines under the name Dracula in the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 10:58 pm
Brinkley v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 9:14 pm
Irex Corp., United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, No. 17-30660, 17 October 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
-registered trademark may recover damages for uses of that trademark that occurred outside the United States and that were not likely to cause consumer confusion in the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
-registered trademark may recover damages for uses of that trademark that occurred outside the United States and that were not likely to cause consumer confusion in the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 1:00 pm
United States Turner v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 8:28 am
And following the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Azar v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 4:15 am
Patsy's Brand, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ordered that the June 4, 2020 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York be vacated for not complying with the Second Circuit’s mandate, with judgment being entered for Patsy’s Brand and the case dismissed. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 1:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 3:45 am
On August 13, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decided that it is allowed so long as there is no likelihood of confusion under 15 U.S.C.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am
In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am
In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
