Search for: "Brandes v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,951
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am
In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am
In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:57 am
United States, 2009 WL 211067 (1st Cir. 2009). [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 2:23 pm
Case: M Waikiki v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 10:52 am
United States; Doe v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:49 pm
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2016-1785, 10 February 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:18 pm
Heasley and Phillip V. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:59 pm
United States case went on to give the following useful summary of the state of the presumption of irreparable harm law in IP cases. [read post]
5 May 2016, 12:34 pm
In August 2015, the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held in Varsity Brands, Inc.. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 4:15 am
Patsy's Brand, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ordered that the June 4, 2020 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York be vacated for not complying with the Second Circuit’s mandate, with judgment being entered for Patsy’s Brand and the case dismissed. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 1:20 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:04 am
Trial evidence supported the district court’s judgment, blocking registration of VAGISAN in the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:47 pm
United States (1996)), and two came after (United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
Julin v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm
District Judge in Seattle ruled that transporting and reselling unaltered “Trader Joe’s” branded products in Canada does not give rise to a lawsuit for trademark infringement in the United States under U.S. trademark laws. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:22 am
DirecTV decision was recently cited by the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia as an alternative basis for remanding a case to state court in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 12:27 pm
Deetsch v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 10:43 am
United States Romag Fasteners v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:59 am
United States case went on to give the following useful summary of the state of the presumption of irreparable harm law in IP cases. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
Cancellation of the candy maker’s trademark registration was affirmed (PIM Brands Inc. v. [read post]
