Search for: "Bridgeman v. State" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2014, 1:58 pm by Peter Hirtle
  Finally, in light of the decision in Bridgeman v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 2:03 pm by Alexandre Miura
Speakers include James Bridgeman SC, Professor Mark Engelman, Jane Lambert, Christian Panayi, and Elizabeth Nicholls. [read post]
15 May 2022, 12:25 am by Frank Cranmer
Ecclesiastical Law Journal The latest issue of the EccLJ is now available, including: Daniel J Hill, ‘Could the State do Without Marriage Law? [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: Art, access and the public domain after Bridgeman v Corel’ – 29 April, New York City: (creativecommons.org), (Public Knowledge) US: ACI ‘Paragraph IV disputes’ conference – 30 April – 1 May, New York City: (Orange Book Blog) Pharma & Biotech Pharma & Biotech - General Canada: Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) departs from its guidelines in determining price in recent decision:… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:34 pm by Howard Knopf
Such a tariff or equivalent mechanism would never get off the ground in the USA for many reasons, including that state sovereign immunity is well established by the U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]