Search for: "Bridges v. Commissioner of Correction" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2023, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In deciding which of those meanings was intended, the CA and the tribunals below were correct to consider the context and whether that assisted in identifying the correct meaning. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
Houldsworth & Anor v Bridge Trustees Ltd & Anor and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 20 – 21 June 2011. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
  First there is Houldsworth v Bridge Trustees Limited  and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions on Monday 20 and Tuesday 21 June 2011. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:55 am by CMS
In relation to “tunnel”, the Supreme Court held that the Court of Appeal (and tribunals) had been correct to consider the statutory context. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm by Patricia Hughes
INTRODUCTION Recently RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki admitted she really didn’t understand the term “systemic racism” and later showed she was correct when she provided an old and obvious example of indirect discrimination as an example of systemic racism. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Events 1 December 2016, Event: Internet & Social Media Law 2016, Grange Tower Bridge Hotel, London. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:04 pm
[which begins] When does a cardboard box under a bridge qualify as a "home address? [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 1 to 6 February 2021 Julian Knowles J heard the trial in the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
On 31 July 2023, the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) refused permission to appeal against the sentences of two Just Stop Oil protestors who scaled the bridge at the Dartford crossing, R. v Trowland & Anor [2023] EWCA Crim 919. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
IPSO The Daily Express has flagged up a Brexit story correction on its front page for the second time within a week, following an IPSO ruling. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
  This means that data protection of Facebook’s business would not be exclusively limited to the Irish Data Protection Commissioner. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Morge (FC) (Appellant) v Hampshire County Council (Respondent) on appeal from [2010] EWCA Civ 608- Read judgment We cannot drive a coach-and-horses through natural habitats without a bit of soul-searching, says the Supreme Court . [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:00 am
  We would not begin to say whether the Court’s characterizations of the evidence and argument from the Daubert briefs are correct, any more than we would say whether an opinion that Actos causes bladder cancer or that the drug’s sponsor should have taken some additional action is correct. [read post]