Search for: "Bridges v. Superior Court" Results 141 - 160 of 224
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm by Andrew Langille
Nixon, 2005 BCCA 601 (also see the Superior Court decision).In the recently released decision in Rocha v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 9:26 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The Illinois Supreme Court has announced that tomorrow morning, October 18, it will file opinions in six civil cases: No. 112064 - Pielet v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:06 pm
• The panel reached another split decision - 2 to 1 - "finding that although appellant could reasonably be found to have been engaged in a rescue, the bridge collapsed because of intervening circumstances not attributable to Finazzo," • Then both the trial court and Superior Court affirmed, although one judge, Judge Donohue, dissented from the Superior Court's majority opinion. [read post]
Supp. 2d 367, 374 (D.N.J. 2010). 41037-1-II / 41047-8-II FACTS The State charged Roden in two separate cause numbers with attempted possession of heroin (superior court cause no. 09-1-01153-0) and with possession of heroin (superior court cause no. 10-1-00091-4). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:56 am by Jonathan Zasloff
Superior Court, better known as the Mono Lake case, saved California’s second-largest lake from drying up. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by Russ Bensing
On to the courts of appeals… In State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:33 am by Andrew Langille
Tsige, a decision released yesterday by Ontario's Court of Appeal which overturned a 2011 Superior Court decision penned by Justice Kevin Whitaker. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:34 pm by PaulKostro
In this case, it is up to the Chancery Division to determine whether the claims asserted should be addressed in the Family Part or transferred to another Part or Division of the Superior Court as the matter proceeds. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by Mandelman
  Well, if I remember correctly, there was a whole gaggle of talking heads acting kind of superior and questioning why the group was protesting and what their goals were? [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:00 am by Marie Louise
Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics (Pharma Patents) US: CAFC Affirms district court de novo review in section 146 action: Streck v. [read post]