Search for: "Bridgestone Firestone Inc" Results 21 - 40 of 80
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2012, 2:47 am by Andrew Trask
.), conceded that this left open a distinct issue of judge-shopping, one that his colleague Judge Easterbrook had identified long ago in In re Bridgestone/Firestone. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:15 am
Finding that it does not, the court repudiates Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:35 am by South Florida Lawyers
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 891 So. 2d 1188, 1191-92 (Fla. 4 DCA 2005) (“We agree with plaintiffs that the proffer reflected facts from which it could be found that Firestone knew about the tread separation, but delayed warning the public in order to protect its own financial interests. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am by Katherine Gallo
Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (TRG 2011) ¶8:66 citing Bridgestone-Firestone Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am by Katherine Gallo
Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (TRG 2011) ΒΆ8:66 citing Bridgestone-Firestone Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am by Bexis
 The Supreme Court overturned one of our sentimental favorites, In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:23 am by John L. Welch
On December 7, 2011, the CAFC heard oral argument [mp3 here] in an appeal (Appeal No. 2010-1376) from the TTAB's decision in Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLC and Bridgestone Corporation v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:46 am by James (Jim) A. Goodman
The court found that the real party in interest did not meet the evidentiary burden imposed by the California Supreme Court in Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:46 am by James Goodman
The court found that the real party in interest did not meet the evidentiary burden imposed by the California Supreme Court in Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm by Bexis
 Right now, the California intermediate appellate courts are split, as well, on whether to follow Bridgestone/Firestone. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm
Conclusion Because of the Court's interpretation of who is a "party," this opinion calls into question some earlier class action injunction cases, such as In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:40 am by Sean Wajert
., In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 288 F.3d 1012, 1018-19 (7th Cir. 2002) (noting that class treatment of tire defect litigation was unmanageable in part because individual factors could affect the alleged tire failure); Sanneman v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:14 am by Sean Wajert
In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 288 F.3d at 1015.See also Isaacs v. [read post]