Search for: "Bright v. Bright" Results 101 - 120 of 4,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2018, 7:48 am by Daily Record Staff
Gill Bright, of involuntary manslaughter, the use of a firearm in the commission of a felony or crime of violence, and the ... [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 9:06 pm
CAAF's unanimous opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 9:56 pm by Mary Whisner
Silicon Flatirons and Colorado Law present Blurred v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:38 pm by The Complex Litigator
 In Bright v. 99¢ ONLY STORES, the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Five) held that (1) violations of Wage Order No. 7, subdivision 14 are violations of section 1198; and (2) civil penalties under section 2699, subdivision (f) are available despite the fact that Commission wage order No. 7-2001 has its own penalty provision. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:18 am by Zachary C. Jackson
  Previously, Judge Castillo too rejected Fifield’s bright-line test in Montel Aetnastak, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Notable among them is R v Neil, 2002 SCC 70, where Binnie J applies a bright-line test to identify lawyers’ conflicts of interest. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:14 pm by Richard M. Re
Last week, the Supreme Court issued an unusual pro-criminal defendant summary reversal in the Double Jeopardy case Martinez v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 9:46 am
In the meantime, though, the bright guys over at BrightScope have, and their’s is a very interesting take. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:18 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
In affirming the Court of Chancery’s finding of fair value in an appraisal proceeding, the Delaware Supreme Court in Golden Telecom, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 9:18 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
In affirming the Court of Chancery’s finding of fair value in an appraisal proceeding, the Delaware Supreme Court in Golden Telecom, Inc. v. [read post]