Search for: "Bright v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 3,139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2011, 6:10 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
 The California Supreme Court denied review of this case in February 2011.Eugenia Bright, a cashier at the discount retail chain 99 Cents Only Stores, initiated a class action against her employer in Bright v. 99 Cents Only Stores, 189 Cal. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm by Dave
  Alternatively, drawing on Thlimmenos v Greece (2001) 31 EHRR 15, the right is also violated “when states without an objective and reasonable justification fail to treat differently persons whose situations are significantly different”. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm by Dave
  Alternatively, drawing on Thlimmenos v Greece (2001) 31 EHRR 15, the right is also violated “when states without an objective and reasonable justification fail to treat differently persons whose situations are significantly different”. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:00 pm by Benson Varghese
There is a four factor-test for whether an area is a curtilage which was established in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:04 am by Jon Robinson
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:26 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Gaitis Last week’s United States Supreme Court decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:47 am by Dennis Crouch
Prior to the actual decision in Loper Bright, Google had anticipated Chevron’s overruling and moved (in the case of Sonos v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That, the opinion added, is a “bright line” rule. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Loper Bright v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:01 am by Buckingham
On June 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court overruled the “physical presence” bright-line rule for substantial nexus in its landmark decision South Dakota v. [read post]