Search for: "Brill v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2007, 9:26 am
The First Department noted the recent Court of Appeals decisions in Miceli v State Farm Mut. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:03 am
.), Rodrigo Polanco Lazo (Univ. of Chile), & Paolo Turrini (Univ. of Trento) have published International Investment Law in Latin America / Derecho Internacional de las Inversiones en América Latina : Problems and Prospects / Problemas y Perspectivas (Brill | Nijhoff 2016). [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
United States Blog Law Online has a post “Trump Hits the Wall of Courts’ Prior Restraint Precedents”. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
IPKat readers are able to receive a 15% discount on the cover price by pre-ordering here, and using code SHLL15 at the checkout.KatFriend Professor Danny Friedmann informed our readers about a publishing opportunity from the publisher Brill to edit a volume on “Wine Law And Policy: From National Terroirs to a Global Market. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:02 pm
The Sixth and Seventh Circuits have taken the contrary position, with the Seventh Circuit reasoning in Brill v. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 5:26 am by William Ford
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Linde v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The Protocol allows the highest national courts of Member States to pose questions to the Court on the interpretation and application of Convention rights in pending cases. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 8:14 am
. - Law), & Alain Pellet (Université Paris Nanterre - Law) have published The International Legal Order: Current Needs and Possible Responses: Essays in Honour of Djamchid Momtaz (Brill | Nijhoff 2017). [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:49 pm by William Ford
David Kimball-Stanley summarized the decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to affirm the lower court’s dismissal of Fields v. [read post]
5 May 2018, 7:43 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Sophia Brill returned to last Wednesday’s Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]