Search for: "Brink v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2011, 12:09 pm
Contents include:Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger, Keynote Speech: Resources of Conflict – Conflicts over ResourcesCindy Daase, The Redistribution of Resources in Internationalized Intra-State Peace Processes by Comprehensive Peace Agreements and Security Council ResolutionsAlice Ruzza, The Falkland Islands and the UK v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 7:45 am
The appeals court remanded the matter to the lower court for an explanation of that decision and otherwise affirmed the district court’s judgment (Brink v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
”); United States v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:00 am
It then also notes that the plaintiffs and the United States as amicus had connected the abortion right to the right of consenting adults to engage in same-sex sexual conduct (recognized in Lawrence v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 am
To understand how we got to Janus v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
(That is why analogies between the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of ECUSA are inapt.) [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 8:19 pm
Ed. 2d 639 (1980) (quoting United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:02 am
Brink later told a state investigator that the two held hands and “Henry was more affectionate with Donna than most people were,” an interview summary said. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 5:43 am
The Cases of the United States and the NetherlandsBibi Van Ginkel, Combating International Terrorism: New Powers for the Security Council? [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 9:47 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware) just reaffirmed, in the context of an ERISA plan that offers employees the option of investing in a fund consisting solely of the employer's own securities, there is a "presumption that a fiduciary acted prudently in investing in employer securities" and that, to rebut the presumption, "a 'plaintiff must show that the ERISA fiduciary could not… [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 12:30 pm
United States, 2010 U.S. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
United States and ex parte Endo. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:02 am
The [United States Geological Service] population models, which predict a trend of extinction across three of the four polar bear ecoregions in as little as 75 years, particularly give the court pause. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 5:52 am
Celebrezze v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 3:00 am
About two-thirds of them were Japanese-Americans who were born in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
About two-thirds of them were Japanese-Americans who were born in the United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 3:49 pm
But this case is not about the United States' or Texas' rights to implement criminal laws. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm
United States, a case about whether employee stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act of 1937. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 12:23 pm
In Natural Resources Defense Council v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am
Frank-Erich Hufnagel argued that any concerns in Germany over the United States (as a jurisdiction) violating international law through the grant of antisuit injunctions would have to be addressed at the diplomatic level, with the Federal Republic of Germany, represented by its government, holding talks with the United States. [read post]
