Search for: "British Telecommunications PLC" Results 21 - 40 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2011, 5:40 am
Justice Arnold's judgment in Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation & Others v British Telecommunications Plc [2011] EWHC 2714 (Ch) (26 Oct 2011) where he ordered BT to use Cleenfeed to hinder its subscribers from accessing the website known as Newzbin II. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 3:19 am
Supreme Court Author Christine SmithLicence Creative Commons attribution share alike 4.0 internationalSource Wikipedia Jane Lambert Supreme Court (Lords Mance, Kerr, Sumption, Mance and Hodge) Cartier International AG and others v British Telecommunications Plc and another [2018] 1 WLR 3259, [2018] WLR 3259, [2018] WLR (D) 354, [2018] UKSC 28 What this [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Blackwood, R v [2012] EWCA Crim 390 (05 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) British Telecommunications Plc , R (on the application of) v BPI (British Recorded Music Industry) Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 232 (06 March 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Iorashi [2012] EWHC 448 (QB) (05 March 2012) KC v MGN Ltd [2012] EWHC 483 (QB) (05 March 2012) … [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 2:23 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) NT, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 711 (31 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Vodafone Ltd & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc Office of Communications [2010] EWCA Civ 391 (20 April 2010) Walbrook Trustees (Jersey) Ltd. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:39 am by Jim Singer
British Telecommunications PLC, the Federal Circuit allowed a manufacturer to file a declaratory judgment action after its customers were accused of patent infringement, even through the manufacturer itself was not directly accused of infringement. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 4:29 am by admin
British Telecommunications Plc (BT) has been fined £300,000 and was ordered to pay costs of £196,150 at Southwark Crown Court, after admitting breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, which states that employers must "ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
The order which UEFA obtained was very similar to the orders made in Football Association Premier League Ltd v British Telecommunications plc [2017] EWHC 1877 (Ch), (“FAPL v BT II“) following the earlier order in Football Association Premier League Ltd v British Telecommunications plc [2017] EWHC 480 (Ch), [2017] ECC 17 (“FAPL v BT I“). [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
Swift copyright infringement suit https://t.co/CGlIGdVznx 2021-12-22 blocking order granted by UK court, Nintendo Co Ltd v British Telecommunications Plc & Ors [2021] EWHC 3488 (IPEC)… https://t.co/FVkSSQ7gDd…The post Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2021-12-25 appeared first on Barry Sookman. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
Ltd v British Telecommunications Plc… https://t.co/LsAUE3vpXm…The post Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2022-01-22 appeared first on Barry Sookman. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 am by Julius Stobbs
Julius Stobbs and Katherine ThompsonIn a recent decision (Cartier International AGand others (Respondents) v British Telecommunications Plc and another(Appellants) [2018] UKSC 28), the UK Supreme Court has ruled that brand owners must pay Internet Service Providers’ (ISPs) costs for implementing website blocking injunctions. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:49 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Aktas v Adepta (A Registered Charity) [2010] EWCA Civ 1170 (22 October 2010) Wilkinson & The Estate of Brian Wilkinson v Farmer [2010] EWCA Civ 1148 (22 October 2010) Law Debenture Trust Corporation Plc v Elektrim SA & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1142 (22 October 2010) Oakes, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1169 (22 October 2010) Dry, R (on the application of) v West Oxfordshire District Council… [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 1:29 am by Magdaleen Jooste
The  High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales has come out with another ruling concerning blocking injunctions, this time in the case of Matchroom Boxing Ltd and another v British Telecommunications plc and others [2020] EWHC 2868 (Ch). [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-12-16 https://t.co/NUTW90LRdx 2018-12-17 Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-12-16 https://t.co/FCnpbvhRBN 2018-12-17 Blocking order refused for a non exclusive licensee Queensberry Promotions Ltd v British Telecommunications Plc & O… https://t.co/RRgaxyiMZ0 2018-12-17 [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 10:16 am
Current members of the TMPDF are ARM Ltd; AstraZeneca plc; Babcock International Ltd; BAE Systems plc; BP p.l.c.; British Telecommunications plc; British-American Tobacco Co Ltd; BTG plc; Delphi Corp.; Dow Corning Ltd; Dyson Technology Ltd; ExxonMobil Chemical Ltd; Ford of Europe; Fujitsu Services Ltd; G E Healthcare; GKN plc; GlaxoSmithKline plc; Hewlett-Packard Ltd; IBM UK Ltd; Infineum UK Ltd; Kodak Ltd; Merck Sharp… [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:57 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) A, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 2908 (01 December 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Sivapalan & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWHC 2955 (Admin) (01 December 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)     Tiscali UK Ltd v British Telecommunications Plc [2008] EWHC 2927 (QB) (01 December 2008) Source: www.bailii.org… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:45 am
In Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Others v Newzbin Ltd. [2010] EWHC 608 (Ch), [2010] ECC 13, [2010] FSR 21, [2010] EMLR 17, [2010] ECDR 8, members of the Motion Picture Association of America Inc. [read post]