Search for: "Britt v. Britt"
Results 61 - 80
of 185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2016, 10:47 am
Playboy commissioned nude photographs of one Britt Dekker, to be published in the December 2011 edition of the magazine. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 1:30 am
After, what felt like a small eternity to this writer, the CJEU has released its judgment on the case yesterday.The case of GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV dealt with pictures of Britt Dekker (a famous Dutch TV personality), commissioned by Sanoma Media for publication in Playboy magazine. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
(People v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:59 am
Here's one of the criminal cases left that may be a biggie:Taylor v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:27 am
We can’t ask second-graders, even ones as patriotic as Isiah Britt who raised all that money, to raise enough money to keep our kids healthy.You hear a lot about government overreach, how Obama -- he’s for big government. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 1:30 am
Sanoma Media, the publisher of the famous magazine Playboy, had commissioned a photographer to take photos for the magazine of Britt Dekker, a Dutch TV personality. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:42 am
See Britt v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:42 am
See Britt v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 11:43 am
State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 11:43 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 4:29 am
The case was EEOC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:05 pm
Britt, CPA, J.D. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:06 am
Britt, 508 F.2d 1052 (U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
The compensation amount under Section 1.61 21(f)(5)(iii) remains unchanged at $215,000.The Code provides that the $1,000,000,000 threshold used to determine whether a multiemployer plan is a systematically important plan under section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(aa) is adjusted using the cost-of-living adjustment provided under Section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(bb). [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Harking back to a time before fax, email, and before any of our intellectual property laws in the UK existed in their present form, when neither OHIM nor the EPO existed and WIPO was but a babe, he reminisced thus:WHERE ARE WE v WHERE I THOUGHT WE’D BE My first taste of IP came in 1973, when I found myself researching for a PhD on ownership of IP rights. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:32 pm
In XOG Operating, LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:32 pm
In XOG Operating, LLC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 3:56 pm
This case (The North Carolina State Bar v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:15 pm
– Chicago lawyer Richard Beem on his blog, Beem on Patents Remijas v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
Williams v. [read post]
