Search for: "Britt v. Britt"
Results 161 - 180
of 185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2009, 2:02 pm
In Ocmulgee Fields Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 5:37 pm
Britt, CPA, J.D. 1200 Abernathy Road, Suite 1700 Atlanta, Georgia 30328 404-567-6445 “Lawyer's That Mean Business” [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:52 pm
Britt, CPA, J.D. 1200 Abernathy Road, Suite 1700 Atlanta, Georgia 30328 404-567-6445 “Lawyer's That Mean Business” [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 2:38 pm
Earl Britt of Raleigh, dismissed the commitment proceedings for each of them. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 6:59 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond ruled in January in the case U.S. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 6:43 am
Britt, 388 F.3d 1369, 1372 (11th Cir. 2004). [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
Britt, 508 F.2d 1052, 1055 (5th Cir. 1975) (citing Henzel, 296 F.2d 650); see also United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 8:59 am
(Britt Lindsey)The State's response. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 5:25 am
In Britt v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 12:25 am
As another example, this one from the Virginia Supreme Court in Britt Construction v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
Earl Britt of the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 12:41 pm
Britt v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:00 pm
" (Britt v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:31 pm
Terry and Britt McClung also made significant contributions. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 11:42 am
November 2001, v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:42 am
This week on the legal-affairs podcast Lawyer2Lawyer, we discuss the recent Supreme Court decision Sprint/United Management Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:52 am
Earl Britt basically followed the recent decision by a Magistrate Judge in Arista v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
Thus, while it is clear that a plaintiff-client must prove negligence (i.e., that the defendant-attorney failed to exercise that degree of care, skill, and diligence commonly possessed and exercised by members of the legal community), some cases hold that the negligence must be "the" proximate cause of damages (Britt v Legal Aid Soc., 95 NY2d 443, 446; see e.g. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 6:27 pm
The September 7 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 2:15 pm
The full opinion in US v. [read post]
