Search for: "Broadcast Music Inc et al v. J " Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
GB News is facing four new impartiality investigations from broadcast regulator Ofcom. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am by centerforartlaw
The Berne Convention establishes minimum protections for creators of works including but not limited to the right to make adaptations and arrangements of the work, perform it in public, adapt it into musical works, broadcast it, and make reproductions in any manner or form. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
Quebecor Media Inc. et al, 2022 ONSC 3749. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
[Closing out Week Two of our FTC UMC Rulemaking symposium is a contribution from a very special guest: Commissioner Noah J. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright The Evan Law blog has an article summarising Finley v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
 Of course, if the Obama Administration intends to request Senate confirmation of Hesse and William J. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Maritime Broadcasting System Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:10 am by Barry Sookman
Earlier today, a number of international and foreign associations and copyright scholars filed an Amicus brief in the Supreme Court of the United States in the ABC, Inc. et al v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (2d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Twelve Foreign Performing SocietiesAmicus brief of Broadcast Music, Inc.Amicus brief of Independent Music Publishers et al.Amicus brief of Ralph OmanPetitioner's reply Title: Lockwood v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]