Search for: "Broida v. Broida" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
” Her further explanation highlighted the fundamental issue of sovereign authority: The short decision in Hospital Diagnostic relies solely on a citation to Broida v Bancroft (103 AD2d 88 [2d Dept 1984]), a shareholder derivative action that did not involve a request for corporate dissolution. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
” Her further explanation highlighted the fundamental issue of sovereign authority: The short decision in Hospital Diagnostic relies solely on a citation to Broida v Bancroft (103 AD2d 88 [2d Dept 1984]), a shareholder derivative action that did not involve a request for corporate dissolution. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
” Her further explanation highlighted the fundamental issue of sovereign authority: The short decision in Hospital Diagnostic relies solely on a citation to Broida v Bancroft (103 AD2d 88 [2d Dept 1984]), a shareholder derivative action that did not involve a request for corporate dissolution. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
[Klamm], 205 AD2d 459 [1st Dept 1994]; Broida v Bancroft, 103 AD2d 88 [2d Dept 1984]; Tosi v Pastene & Co., 34 AD2d 520 [1st Dept 1970]). [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am by Rob Robinson
Samsung: Lack of Custodian Follow-Up+Failure to Suspend Auto-Deletion of Email=Adverse Inference - http://bit.ly/MaaYhA (@LegalHoldPro) Who's Tweeting live from the Apple v Samsung trial? [read post]