Search for: "Brooker v. Brooker"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2009, 1:47 am
Fisher v Brooker and Others House of Lords “A delay of almost 40 years in claiming a share of the copyright in a musical work, could not be defeated by the equitable doctrines of estoppel or laches when the defendants had suffered no detriment from the claimant's delay and, on the contrary, had derived a financial benefit [...] [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:49 am
Fisher v Brooker and another [2009] UKHL 41; [2009] WLR (D) 274 “When a claimant did not, for almost 40 years, assert his right to a share of the copyright in intellectual property, his claim could not be defeated by the doctrines of estoppel or laches when the defendants had suffered no detriment by acting in [...] [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 8:57 am
Today’s Second Circuit summary order in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 1:57 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Rochester, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 678 (04 April 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Brooker & Anor v Fisher [2008] EWCA Civ 287 (04 April 2008) Masri v Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 303 (04 April 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Fashoff (UK) Ltd (t/a Moschino Forall Confezioni Spa) v Linton & Anor [2008] EWHC 537 (Ch) (19 March 2008) Pipe &… [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 4:07 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 1:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:01 am
Lioness Vizions, LLC et al v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Board of Education as Briggs v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 11:32 am
You can read the decision in Fisher v Brooker [2009] UKHL 41, in full and hot off the internet here and here.The Lord Law Lords (including one Legal Lady: Baroness Hale, who does remember the 1960s) have ruled that Fisher, who claimed he wrote the haunting pseudo-Bach organ melody which opened the song, is entitled to a share of future royalties. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:54 am
Fisher v Brooker [2009] UKHL 41 In October, their Lordships (?) [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:03 pm
Boyd & Associates, Brooker v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 3:15 pm
He is also emerging as the Charlie Brooker of IT law:-) [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:53 am
So farewell to a court that has provided a vast range of legal judgments from Attwood v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 12:27 pm
Boyd & Associates, Brooker v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 2:28 pm
Boyd & Associates, Brooker v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:40 pm
Boyd & Associates, Brooker v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 2:26 am
Now, the Court of Appeal was dealing with a question of trespass to land but, having regard to the House of Lords’ remarks in Fisher v Brooker, may be worth bearing in mind in intellectual property cases as, generally, an IP owner seeks an injunction when their rights are being infringed [read post]
22 May 2008, 7:55 am
Shanti Brooker, Defendant-Appellant.2008 WL 2130341, 2008 N.Y. [read post]
