Search for: "Brooks v. State; Owens v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
Defense Attorneys: Matthew Scott Owen and Daniel S. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 11:10 am
(One for each dollar of his special assessment, on the sole reversed count).United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 11:01 am
Owens v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 8:05 am
Before Owens v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 2:15 pm
State, No. 103,915 (Douglass)K.S.A. 60-1507 appeal (petition for review)Jessica R. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Brooks v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 12:29 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 10:06 am
Most states have similar laws. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 6:50 am
Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling in Obama v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
Brooks, partner, and Samantha E. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:46 am
Owens based upon the defendant’s throwing a bag of crack underneath the front of his vehicle when he exited it… In State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 11:53 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am
In the courts: Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (30 March 2011): Supreme Court: Teachers employed by Sec of State to work abroad at European Schools entitled to the protection against unfair dismissal – see the Education Law Blog. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
US states are considering tightening regulations. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:14 am
In Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
Wyeth Laboratories, 919 F.2d 397, 405 (6th Cir. 1990) (applying Ohio law); Brooks v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
L. 1221-1253 (2011).Rice, Brooks V. [read post]
