Search for: "Brooks v. State Dept. of Human Resources"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
The Wisconsin Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide is a Guide for individuals and families in Wisconsin affected by cerebral palsy. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:36 am
North Carolina Dept. of Human Resources, 347 N.C. 247 (1997), where a majority of the court held that the state could choose to pay for the childbirth expenses of indigent women but not for medically necessary abortions for the same population. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
And the state, either as the traditionally conceived apex of political order, or as the repository of large aggregations of power within an international state system, now serves as a (but not the) nexus point for the regulatory power of technique. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
Research and resources The new issue of the Journal of Media Law is available here, with articles concerning open justice, copyright, privacy, and libel. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06 OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Colorado Dept of Trans, No. 07-1494 (10th Cir. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
