Search for: "Brooks v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 1,139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
Vill. of Fox Lake and the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s 2016 ruling in United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1473 v. [read post]
Vill. of Fox Lake and the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s 2016 ruling in United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1473 v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 11:02 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Based in Elmhurst and downtown Chicago, our Geneva and Oak Brook non-compete agreement and business dispute lawyers take cases from Aurora and Naperville and many other cities throughout Illinois, as well as in Indiana, Wisconsin and the entire United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 5:48 am by Christiana Wayne
Lawfare AssociateAssistant Editor Bryce Klehm sat down with Ryan Hass, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, for a wide-ranging discussion on the United States’s China policy. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:28 am by sally
Supreme Court Inveresk plc v Papermakers Ltd [2010] UKSC 19 (05 May 2010) Farstad Supply AS v Enviroco Ltd [2010] UKSC 18 (05 May 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) White & Ors v The Crown [2010] EWCA Crim 978 (05 May 2010) Cooper, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 979 (05 May 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Brookes v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 420 (29 April 2010) Durham Tees Valley… [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm by INFORRM
  When such appointments are made in the United States the judicial record of the appointee is subject to minute analysis over many months. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:37 am
” In Brooks v State of New York, NY2d, the Court of Claims considered a case involving alleged libel brought by an employee of one State agency against the State because of the allegedly disparaging statements made about him by the employee of another State agency. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:38 am
 at *4-5 (internal citations omitted).ConclusionThe judgment of the United States Court of Appeals forthe Federal Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.Highmark, Inc. at *5. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:19 pm by Erin Napoleon
Written by Chief Justice Roger Brooke Taney, whose bust sits inside the entrance to the Old Supreme Court Chamber in the United States Capitol, this opinion declared that African Americans were not citizens of the United States and could not sue in Federal courts. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
The law firm Bains Cohen (acting pro bono for the claimant, Nicola Brooke) and a PR agency are leading the campaign. [read post]