Search for: "Brown, v. United States et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 396
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am
By Nina Rice* The history of New York’s statutory law pertaining to the art market is relatively brief despite the state’s long held status as the art capital of the United States, if not the world. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 2:34 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:25 am
Like in Shatz, the parties in Kulick formed an LLC, known as SLP, as an investment vehicle—in this case for investment real properties in the Southeastern United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:57 pm
" United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
Parental rights extend to the right to have children,[10] the right to “direct the upbringing and education” of their children,[11] and a right to family integrity.[12] In comparison, children in the United States are left with few rights: constitutional jurisprudence has denied children an affirmative constitutional right to an education[13] and health care.[14] Where Can Children Find the Right to Consent? [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:02 pm
Bishop of Mayer Brown LLP in Chicago represents the Pork Producers Council et al. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Consider the now infamous case, United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 7:27 am
Chamber of Com. et al., to the Members of U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
Quebecor Media Inc. et al, 2022 ONSC 3749. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
27 May 2022, 5:30 pm
The qui tam case is captioned United States, et al. ex rel. [read post]
26 May 2022, 11:30 am
The qui tam case is captioned United States, et al. ex rel. [read post]
7 May 2022, 3:51 am
This is what allowed the Supreme Court to decide Brown v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:08 pm
Well, first, don’t eat British Columbia, Canada oysters for a bit. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Jesus Ferreira, Appellant, vCity of Binghamton et al., Respondents. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Jesus Ferreira, Appellant, vCity of Binghamton et al., Respondents. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am
Recent examples include the State of Georgia’s litigation to stop Carl Malamud and Public.Resource.Org from publishing the Official Code of Georgia Annotated in the United States (Georgia et al. v. [read post]
