Search for: "Brown and Bishop v. US" Results 1 - 20 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(For contemporary illustrations of this point, see the interpretation recently promulgated by Bishop Mark Lawrence, or the statement of Bishop Shaw on gay marriage in his diocese, or the court's decision in the Dixon v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:16 pm
  (One of seven from today, I might add.)I don't imagine that appellant's counsel -- Timothy Bishop from Mayer Brown -- tries to pick up women in bars much, that he uses his professional status to do so, or that he'd elect to use today's case were he to decide otherwise. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:02 pm by Dan Flynn
Bishop of Mayer Brown LLP in Chicago represents the Pork Producers Council et al. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:25 pm
") In 1909, the Texas Supreme Court followed Watson in the case of Brown v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:01 am by Amy Howe
” Today at noon and again on Saturday at 6 p.m., Kevin Russell discusses Brown v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:41 am
They first will contend that the Texas Supreme Court should follow its 1909 holding in Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
 Under that statute, it is `unlawful for any person to use a computer or computer network to . . . [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
For these reasons, the gag order did not further a compelling interest based on the record before us. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s equivocal denial of knowledge of the terms of the settlement is flatly contradicted by the clear terms of the settlement agreement (see Bishop v Maurer, 33 AD3d 497, 499 [1st Dept 2006], affd 9 NY3d 910 [2007]). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Brian Shiffrin
To the extent Bishop suggests that the race-neutrality of an explanation depends on its persuasiveness, it has been effectively overruled by Purkett [ v Elem, 514 US 765, 768 (1995)]. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:46 am by Anders Walker
  In Presser, for example, there is a sizable section on slavery but little else save a brief discussion of Brown v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:37 am by Doug Cornelius
Supreme Court’s definition of an “investment contract” in SEC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:14 am by Amy Howe
”  And Tim Bishop and Chad Clamage do the same at Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog, suggesting that the Court is likely to grant one or more of the “cert petitions, [which] now ask the Court to pick up where it left off in Dukes and Comcast and further flesh out the limits of when a case may be litigated as a class action. [read post]