Search for: "Brown v Doe" Results 141 - 160 of 5,859
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2014, 8:57 am
As Jonathan recently noted, Ken White at Popehat has a post covering some of the ways in which Michael Brown’s robbery does and does not matter legally. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 6:48 pm
With little useful guidance from the parties, no controlling precedent, and the three-year post-remittitur deadline for bringing the case to trial about to expire, the experienced and highly regarded trial judge concluded it does neither. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:02 am
Freezing the payment of salary increments does not freeze the crediting of service for the purpose of determining an employee's increment stepMatter of Meegan v Brown, 63 AD3d 1673In response to a State Comptroller's report concerning a fiscal crisis in the City of Buffalo, the State Legislature passed the Buffalo Fiscal Stability Authority Act on July 3, 2003. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:17 pm
Freezing the payment of salary increments does not freeze the crediting of service for the purpose of determining an employee's increment stepMatter of Meegan v Brown, 63 AD3d 1673In response to a State Comptroller's report concerning a fiscal crisis in the City of Buffalo, the State Legislature passed the Buffalo Fiscal Stability Authority Act on July 3, 2003. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:27 pm
  In District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:42 am by Kent Scheidegger
The Supreme Court of the State of Washington today decided Brown v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm by David Gans
The Court is expected to release its long awaited opinions in Brown v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:46 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard argument in Bartlett v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 10:29 am by Harbir Deol
The post US Supreme Court Reaffirms That Being Highly Paid Does Not Make an Employee ‘Exempt’ appeared first on Brown Rudnick. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, 96 NY2d 300, 301-304 [2001]) and that plaintiff was damaged as a result of such negligence (see Bixby v Somerville, 62 AD3d at 1139). [read post]