Search for: "Brown v. Amaral" Results 41 - 60 of 71
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
By 2010, former two-term governor Jerry Brown decided someone had to save this state, so he mounted a modestly-financed campaigned against the winner of the GOP primary, Meg Whitman, who carried so much GOP baggage into the general election that even spending $180 million (of mostly her own money) could not prevent her from being crushed by Brown. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm by David Bernstein
The two other cases singled out by Amar, Dred Scott and Plessy, were historically extremely important–Dred Scott was seen as extremely significant in its own day, and Plessy as a precedent that potentially stood in the way of Brown v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:42 am by Rachel Sachs
Coverage of the upcoming Term continues to focus on Fisher v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:18 pm by Lawrence Solum
Barry McDonald (Pepperdine University - School of Law) has posted A Reluctant Apology for Plessy: A Response to Akhil Amar (Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 39, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm by Edward A. Fallone
My response to that is to quote Justice Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Conor McEvily
Monday’s decision in Florence v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
  Michael McConnell has made a prominent originalist argument defending Brown v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
At PrawfsBlawg, Mark Kende assesses Justice Scalia’s criticism of the role of empirical evidence in Brown v. [read post]